The article consists of a picture of the sporting cover headline which reads, "USA wins 1-1" and then lots of patronising rubbish about how the stupid Americans don't understand 'our' sport.
Now, far be it from me to suggest there was some irony in The Sun mocking a Murdoch owned propaganda machine for making an error of judgement, but to criticise an American paper for printing"...World Cup match ends with the greatest tie with the British since Bunker Hill." whilst being responsible for running such headlines as 'Super Subs Sink the Germans' is a bit rich really.
"And the US TV networks were full of praise for the US team, endlessly playing Clint Dempsey's goal after Green fumbled the ball." The SunUnlike over here then.
"They also continually referred to the result as a tie — and not the usual football term of a draw for the 1-1 result."I hope this trend of foreign fuzzy-wuzzys developing their own language doesn't continue.
"American media treated the result against Fabio Capello's men as one of the best ever for their national team."To be fair, if the editor of the paper had been reading The Sun's coverage of the World Cup, they probably think they drew with the greatest team ever, ever.
Of course this is all besides the main point which is that the headline is actually a reference to the result of a highly competitive end of season American football game between the universitys of Yale and Harvard.
In the 1968 clash Yale were the much fancied team and indeed led 29-13 going in to the final minute of the game. However, in the last 42 seconds Harvard scored an amazing 16 points to
The Sun missed this ironic headline ,justifiably by their own standards, probably because it would have taken a bout three minutes of research. Or some sporting knowledge outside the English Premier Leage.
And they say that it is the Americans that don't get irony.